what's with all this white text and the dominantly white picture? are you some kind of white supremest?

GIVE #000000 A CHANCE >:C

You are 100% right.

Being offended by something so small automaticlly make you a big fucking retard

You!

I wish people would think like this :( Sadly the world would rather live an ignorantly blissful life, while making a quick buck by being 'offended' by something so stupid you deserve to be pushed off a building :/

Although I'm probably being rather self-centered atm <<
*sigh*

Dude WTF is up with your picture???

hay kid, ur pretty jive!

boss trombone: I made the blog post better
RabidKangaroo15: Sure did
RabidKangaroo15: Now fix your sentence
RabidKangaroo15: faggot

To Kill A Mockingbird: n****r n****r n****r.

Hey rabid, i just want to say, thanks for sucking all the spice off my sausage last night. hey life, we were going to call you and let you watch, but i think you were already touching yourself at the time.

He sure missed out on a good time.

TKaM was a fun book. I had to read it for school, but I got lazy with it and waited till we watched the movie in class.

And to that I say, it's got a good storyline, and the book's probably better than the movie.

Good article.It importantly and nonchalantly discloses and fervently exposes our society at the crossroads when the most critical focal points of our society will eventually collide with the vague truth.

You make an amazing point, screw all those puoting bitches. If they get offended then they should get off the internet

I don't understand. You are using your blog for intelligent thought. Surely you understand these things are to list what you had for dinner last night.

Isn't newgrounds part of the problem with all of its rules restricting what people can say.

When did you get gold aura?

I totally agree with you, and the picture is hillarious.

wili i will answer for you, because Life is too lazy to check his own damn profile.

he's an icon mod, hence the sexy gold aura. jealous much? :P

lol internet censurship.

fuck you

this needs more comments!

...possibly by various authors!

wouldn't having a lot of comments make you feel cool?

maybe just a little bit?

c'mon be honest you know it would!

it's okay tyler, you can tell me.

you know i'm always here to lend an ear!

or possibly just use other peoples accounts to make your ego feel better :0

but that wouldn't be very cool :/

...so we can try to avoid that...

but that probably won't get me very far :(

but using someone elses account is wrong!

but i still do it.

i wonder if sinister cares...

oh whatever i don't care.

cuz ima little fuckaa

LITTLE FUCKAAAAAAAAAA

i've taken this too far at this point

i should probably stop...

but nawwww

oops shouldn't have used this account

lmao. hey buddy how's it going?!

hi i like pineapples.

and i think this is a good account to end with B-)

Eenie, meenie, minie, moe.
Catch a n*gger by the toe.
If he squeals let him go.
Eenie, meenie, minie, moe.

I believe that's what my dad used to sing to me.

Way to live in a nation that overblows censorship, dork!

Where I'm from, you can still call people fat, crippled, mad, negro, short, or whatever, because that is indeed what they are. Sure, some over-americanized right-wing pony-tail pussy will raise his voice about it, but the usual procedure is to slap them until they get it.

So what I'm trying to say is sucks to be you.

Hi, I am Teddy. Once you read this you
cannot get out. Finish reading this
until it is done! As I said, I am
Teddy. I am 7 years old. I have no eyes
and blood all over my face. I am dead.
If you don't send this to at least 12
people I will come to your house at
midnight and I'll hide under your bed.
When you're asleep, I'll kill you.
Don't believe me?
Case 1:
Patty Buckles
Got this e-mail. She doesn't believe
in chain letters. Well, Foolish Patty.
She was sleeping when her TV started
flickering on and off. Now she's not
with us anymore. Ha ha patty, Ha ha!
You don't want to be like Patty, do
you?
Case 2:
George M. Simon
Hates chain mail, but he didn't want
to die that night. He sent it to 4
people. Not good enough George. Now,
George is in a coma, we don't know if
he'll ever wake up. Ha ha George, Ha
ha! Now, do you want to be like George?
Case 3:
Valarie Tyler
She got this letter. Another chain
letter she thought. Only had 7 people
to
send to. Well, That night when she was
having a shower she saw bloody Mary
in the mirror. It was the BIGGEST
fright of her life. Valarie is scarred
for
life.
Case 4:
Derek Minse
This is the final case I'll tell you
about. Well, Derek was a smart person.
He sent it to 12 people. Later that
day, he found a $100.00 bill on the
ground. He was premoted to head
officer at his job and his girlfriend
said
yes to his purposal. Now, Katie and
him are living happily ever after.The
have 2 beautiful children.
Send this to at least 12 people or
you'll face the consequences.
0 people- You will die tonight
1-6 people- you will be injured
7-11 people- you will get the biggest
fright of your life
12 and over- you are safe and will
have good fortune!

Life.

From your comment in my news post: Why do you say that. I got some inspiration from you. So why? Do you hate me? =( I don't like to brag a lot and I try to help. You're one of the good, nice users. Don't hate me!

The American Way: Censor Fucking Everything.

I know, it sucks, but there are still people like me who are just naturally offensive and don't care who we piss off... Eventually we'll all sue everyone for everything anyway.

Hi, I am Teddy. Once you read this you
cannot get out. Finish reading this
until it is done! As I said, I am
Teddy. I am 7 years old. I have no eyes
and blood all over my face. I am dead.
If you don't send this to at least 12
people I will come to your house at
midnight and I'll hide under your bed.
When you're asleep, I'll kill you.
Don't believe me?
Case 1:
Patty Buckles
Got this e-mail. She doesn't believe
in chain letters. Well, Foolish Patty.
She was sleeping when her TV started
flickering on and off. Now she's not
with us anymore. Ha ha patty, Ha ha!
You don't want to be like Patty, do
you?
Case 2:
George M. Simon
Hates chain mail, but he didn't want
to die that night. He sent it to 4
people. Not good enough George. Now,
George is in a coma, we don't know if
he'll ever wake up. Ha ha George, Ha
ha! Now, do you want to be like George?
Case 3:
Valarie Tyler
She got this letter. Another chain
letter she thought. Only had 7 people
to
send to. Well, That night when she was
having a shower she saw bloody Mary
in the mirror. It was the BIGGEST
fright of her life. Valarie is scarred
for
life.
Case 4:
Derek Minse
This is the final case I'll tell you
about. Well, Derek was a smart person.
He sent it to 12 people. Later that
day, he found a $100.00 bill on the
ground. He was premoted to head
officer at his job and his girlfriend
said
yes to his purposal. Now, Katie and
him are living happily ever after.The
have 2 beautiful children.
Send this to at least 12 people or
you'll face the consequences.
0 people- You will die tonight
1-6 people- you will be injured
7-11 people- you will get the biggest
fright of your life
12 and over- you are safe and will
have good fortune!

Hi, I am Teddy. Once you read this you
cannot get out. Finish reading this
until it is done! As I said, I am
Teddy. I am 7 years old. I have no eyes
and blood all over my face. I am dead.
If you don't send this to at least 12
people I will come to your house at
midnight and I'll hide under your bed.
When you're asleep, I'll kill you.
Don't believe me?
Case 1:
Patty Buckles
Got this e-mail. She doesn't believe
in chain letters. Well, Foolish Patty.
She was sleeping when her TV started
flickering on and off. Now she's not
with us anymore. Ha ha patty, Ha ha!
You don't want to be like Patty, do
you?
Case 2:
George M. Simon
Hates chain mail, but he didn't want
to die that night. He sent it to 4
people. Not good enough George. Now,
George is in a coma, we don't know if
he'll ever wake up. Ha ha George, Ha
ha! Now, do you want to be like George?
Case 3:
Valarie Tyler
She got this letter. Another chain
letter she thought. Only had 7 people
to
send to. Well, That night when she was
having a shower she saw bloody Mary
in the mirror. It was the BIGGEST
fright of her life. Valarie is scarred
for
life.
Case 4:
Derek Minse
This is the final case I'll tell you
about. Well, Derek was a smart person.
He sent it to 12 people. Later that
day, he found a $100.00 bill on the
ground. He was premoted to head
officer at his job and his girlfriend
said
yes to his purposal. Now, Katie and
him are living happily ever after.The
have 2 beautiful children.
Send this to at least 12 people or
you'll face the consequences.
0 people- You will die tonight
1-6 people- you will be injured
7-11 people- you will get the biggest
fright of your life
12 and over- you are safe and will
have good Hi, I am Teddy. Once you read this you
cannot get out. Finish reading this
until it is done! As I said, I am
Teddy. I am 7 years old. I have no eyes
and blood all over my face. I am dead.
If you don't send this to at least 12
people I will come to your house at
midnight and I'll hide under your bed.
When you're asleep, I'll kill you.
Don't believe me?
Case 1:
Patty Buckles
Got this e-mail. She doesn't believe
in chain letters. Well, Foolish Patty.
She was sleeping when her TV started
flickering on and off. Now she's not
with us anymore. Ha ha patty, Ha ha!
You don't want to be like Patty, do
you?
Case 2:
George M. Simon
Hates chain mail, but he didn't want
to die that night. He sent it to 4
people. Not good enough George. Now,
George is in a coma, we don't know if
he'll ever wake up. Ha ha George, Ha
ha! Now, do you want to be like George?
Case 3:
Valarie Tyler
She got this letter. Another chain
letter she thought. Only had 7 people
to
send to. Well, That night when she was
having a shower she saw bloody Mary
in the mirror. It was the BIGGEST
fright of her life. Valarie is scarred
for
life.
Case 4:
Derek Minse
This is the final case I'll tell you
about. Well, Derek was a smart person.
He sent it to 12 people. Later that
day, he found a $100.00 bill on the
ground. He was premoted to head
officer at his job and his girlfriend
said
yes to his purposal. Now, Katie and
him are living happily ever after.The
have 2 beautiful children.
Send this to at least 12 people or
you'll face the consequences.
0 people- You will die tonight
1-6 people- you will be injured
7-11 people- you will get the biggest
fright of your life
12 and over- you are safe and will
have good Hi, I am Teddy. Once you read this you
cannot get out. Finish reading this
until it is done! As I said, I am
Teddy. I am 7 years old. I have no eyes
and blood all over my face. I am dead.
If you don't send this to at least 12
people I will come to your house at
midnight and I'll hide under your bed.
When you're asleep, I'll kill you.
Don't believe me?
Case 1:
Patty Buckles
Got this e-mail. She doesn't believe
in chain letters. Well, Foolish Patty.
She was sleeping when her TV started
flickering on and off. Now she's not
with us anymore. Ha ha patty, Ha ha!
You don't want to be like Patty, do
you?
Case 2:
George M. Simon
Hates chain mail, but he didn't want
to die that night. He sent it to 4
people. Not good enough George. Now,
George is in a coma, we don't know if
he'll ever wake up. Ha ha George, Ha
ha! Now, do you want to be like George?
Case 3:
Valarie Tyler
She got this letter. Another chain
letter she thought. Only had 7 people
to
send to. Well, That night when she was
having a shower she saw bloody Mary
in the mirror. It was the BIGGEST
fright of her life. Valarie is scarred
for
life.
Case 4:
Derek Minse
This is the final case I'll tell you
about. Well, Derek was a smart person.
He sent it to 12 people. Later that
day, he found a $100.00 bill on the
ground. He was premoted to head
officer at his job and his girlfriend
said
yes to his purposal. Now, Katie and
him are living happily ever after.The
have 2 beautiful children.
Send this to at least 12 people or
you'll face the consequences.
0 people- You will die tonight
1-6 people- you will be injured
7-11 people- you will get the biggest
fright of your life
12 and over- you are safe and will
have good fortune!

so um... how does one retaliate to the sign you had on your webcam image??? "life sucks dick"?

Says the person who calls himself life

i used to think you were cool, cmon lets stop fighting

are we cool, also internet censorship ftl.

whatever if you lack the proper skills to communicate with people, not my problem

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

>:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

>:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

>:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

>:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

>:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

>:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U >:U

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues

exuality, e, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know of it) there used to be a more negative connotation of this to be offensive to negros. Or how about the Dutch attempting to take the word thin out of the dictionary.

Also from the same article a HR's attempt to take out hard working from job descriptions because it discriminates against the lazy.

Of course we have to be offended by stuffed bears since the Vermont Teddy Bear Company was playing with controversy because their "Crazy For You!" stuffed toy had a straight jacket, offending the mentally handicapped. Or how about body part labels being evil and disgusting because a parent is offended to answer a question about anatomy making The Vagina Monologues to be renamed The Hoohaa Monologues in Florida.

Furthermore, old stories are horrible because the state of Maryland decided to not use To Kill A Mockingbird even though the class was about "Questionable Words".

All of this boils down to the point that our society had become a bunch of whiny victims of choice. Sure some people are racist, biased, sexist, homophobic, < insert label here >, but the moment that we censor all the distaste we close all channels of discussion. Is this a good example to set for our future generations? To be effortlessly offended and sue when even the smallest discomfort is confronting them instead of starting up a dialog?

Our belligerent and easily offended society is plunging down a perilous path that would prefer to view mindless entertainment rather than participate in their communities. People who would rather sit in their own little bubbles than engage with other people. When something is discomforting they are unable to handle it. I for one plan to teach my children to "tolerate the intolerant." If society has not figured out a way to completely censor everything offensive at that point, then I don't think we will have anything left to talk about.exuality, religion, hair color, etc. While the idea of growing a society that is tolerant is a utopian's dream, we are heading down the road that essentially everything is offensive.

For example we have the story of Southwest Airlines being sued (and lost) for a stewardess playing of a nursery rhyme "Eenie, meenie, minie, moe; pick a seat, we gotta go" to help hurry passengers onto the plane. Apparently because at one small point in history (and very few people know o